並排顯示
Box+Dice has a long history with Australian residential sales agencies, particularly in Victoria where MRI cite roughly 60% transaction market share. The product is built around prospecting, contact ranking, and a centralised database shared across teams. Native AI conversation handling, voice agents, and autonomous bulk SMS aren't part of the platform today.
最後更新 April 2026
我們打造了 Ociate。 We'll still tell you when Box+Dice is the better fit. Every section below calls out where each tool wins. Pricing and features come from Box+Dice's public site and review platforms (links at the bottom).
摘要
在以下情況選擇 Ociate
Inbound SMS and voice enquiries need to be answered and qualified without anyone touching them, rather than landing in a workflow that still expects a human to respond.
在以下情況選擇 Box+Dice
You're an established Victorian sales agency or franchise network already running on MRI's stack (Vault, Eagle, PropertyTree) and the cross-office contact database matters more than AI.
兩者皆可,如果
Your team is rebuilding its tooling and weighing classic enterprise CRMs against AI-first newcomers.
一覽
| 功能 | Ociate | Box+Dice |
|---|---|---|
|
AI auto-reply on inbound SMS (autonomous) |
||
|
AI voice agent (answers inbound calls) |
||
|
Bulk SMS campaigns Box+Dice supports email and SMS comms but not autonomous two-way handling. |
||
|
Lead auto-qualification (AI) Box+Dice has dynamic contact ranking, which is rule-based scoring rather than generative AI. |
||
|
Trust accounting Box+Dice has trust functionality integrated; PropertyTree (sister MRI product) is the dedicated PM. |
||
|
Property management module |
||
|
Centralised cross-office contact database Box+Dice's open contact database across teams is one of its real moats. |
||
|
domain.com.au lead-flow integration |
||
|
realestate.com.au integration Box+Dice's integration is domain-led; REA support is less direct. |
||
|
Mobile app Reviewers cite crash and auth issues with the Box+Dice mobile app. |
||
|
Published pricing |
圖例: ✓ 可用 · ◐ 部分 / 透過整合 · ✗ 不可用
優勢
Box+Dice 的不足之處
Ociate 仍在追趕的方面
定價
以下日期各供應商網站上公布的價格摘要。簽約前請與供應商確認。
Ociate
~$500/month
典型辦公室 · 每則簡訊另加約 10 分
Box+Dice
Not published
Per-user / per-agency, custom (enterprise sales)
MRI uses custom pricing across the Box+Dice product. Quotes scale with user count, modules, and agency size. AU sales line: 1300 657 700.
最佳匹配
Box+Dice 最適合
Mid-to-large Australian residential sales agencies and franchise networks (especially in Victoria) that want a centralised cross-office CRM with established workflows and are comfortable inside the MRI stack alongside Vault, Eagle, and PropertyTree.
Ociate 最適合
Sales agencies whose biggest gap is AI conversation handling: autonomous SMS replies, a voice agent for inbound calls, and AI-driven bulk campaigns. Teams that would rather pay for that than another templated workflow tool.
切換中
哪些內容可以沿用、哪些需要重建,以及大致需要多長時間。
順延
需要重建
問題
還在猶豫?預約一次 15 分鐘的通話,我們帶你了解兩個方案。
Not today. Box+Dice covers both inside the MRI suite. Most agencies that rely on those workflows keep them and use Ociate for AI lead handling on the sales side.
Box+Dice has dynamic contact ranking, which is rule-based scoring rather than generative AI. There's no autonomous SMS reply and no voice agent. Ociate's AI handles the conversation; Box+Dice tells you who to call.
Yes. Box+Dice exports contacts and listings to CSV, and our import handles standard fields. Custom workflows and the cross-office database structure need to be re-thought for Ociate's model.
Box+Dice uses custom enterprise pricing, so you'll need a quote from MRI. Ociate's pricing is published, which usually makes the comparison a five-minute job.
Box+Dice's centralised cross-office contact database is one of its real strengths in franchise networks and has been refined over years. Ociate handles multi-user organisations but doesn't yet match that depth on cross-office shared databases.
Yes. Ociate has a 14-day free trial with no credit card. Many agencies route a portion of inbound SMS through Ociate alongside Box+Dice to see how AI handling compares against their current workflow.
來源